Two recently encountered passages have provoked my thoughts about the power—and what may be a slow decline in—visual thinking. Ray Monk‘s article in the New Statesman, Ludwig Wittgenstein’s passion for looking, not thinking, points to Ludwig Wittgenstein‘s unique visual orientation. (He is compared with his fellow philosopher Bertrand Russell who, much to his own frustration, was “hopeless at visualising and was more or less indifferent to the visual arts. His mental life seemed almost entirely made up of words rather than images.”) But not so with Wittgenstein.
“Thinking in pictures,” Sigmund Freud once wrote, “stands nearer to unconscious processes than does thinking in words, and is unquestionably older than the latter both ontogenetically and phylogenetically.” There is, in other words, something primordial, something foundational, about thinking visually…
For Wittgenstein, to think, to understand, was first and foremost to picture…
It was fundamental to Wittgenstein’s thinking…that not everything we can see and therefore not everything we can mentally grasp can be put into words. In the Tractatus, this appears as the distinction between what can be said and what has to be shown. “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent,” runs the famed last sentence of the book but, as Wittgenstein made clear in private conversation and correspondence, he believed those things about which we have to be silent to be the most important…
“Don’t think, look!” Wittgenstein urges…Thus, at the heart of Wittgenstein’s philosophy is what he calls “the understanding which consists in ‘seeing connections’ ”. Here “seeing” is meant not metaphorically, but literally.
In a similar vein, this admonition on the importance of drawing is from architect Michael Graves in his recent opinion in the New York Times, Architecture and the Lost Art of Drawing.
As I work with my computer-savvy students and staff today, I notice that something is lost when they draw only on the computer. It is analogous to hearing the words of a novel read aloud, when reading them on paper allows us to daydream a little, to make associations beyond the literal sentences on the page. Similarly, drawing by hand stimulates the imagination and allows us to speculate about ideas, a good sign that we’re truly alive.
Take out your pencils people. Daydream, associate, imagine, speculate.
5 comments
Comments feed for this article
September 3, 2012 at 6:56 am
Visual Thinking | The Archetypal Garage
[…] entire post at : Slow Muse < Prev Next […]
September 3, 2012 at 11:07 am
Seth Mullins
I experienced the power of image pretty viscerally just this morning. I was struggling with something and trying to motivate myself with self-talk. Eventually I gave this up, laid down for the space of five minutes, and envisioned the outcome I most desired – without using words. This affected my energetic state and mood so much more profoundly than all my inner dialogue had.
September 3, 2012 at 11:17 am
Deborah Barlow
Seth, I have had those kinds of experiences too. It is another path and hard to explain to people who, like Bertrand Russell, are not visual thinkers. Thanks for your comment.
September 11, 2012 at 4:46 pm
Ola Vea
I loved this 😀
October 25, 2012 at 11:48 pm
Notes On Wittgenstein: “Ostensive Teaching Of Words” & “Picture Meaning Of Words” – Part 1. « Loftier Musings
[…] Visual Thinking (slowmuse.wordpress.com) […]